Zohran Mamdani May Not Be NYC’s 111th Mayor After All
Zohran Mamdani May Not Be NYC’s 111th Mayor After All-
Self-described Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani will make history on January 1, 2026, as the first Muslim mayor of New York City and one of the youngest mayors the city’s had in over a hundred years. But a historian now says that Mamdani may not even be the 111th mayor.

Mamdani won the election with 50.78% of the vote, beating Republican Curtis Sliwa and independent Andrew Cuomo. The election was closely watched in November.
The race got the most participants since 1993 and got a lot of attention across the country, in part because people like President Donald Trump criticized it.
At the age of 34, Mamdani is the city’s youngest mayor since the 1800s, and he is now a well-known member of the progressive left. The move from being a State Assembly member to the mayor of the city was mostly due to his grassroots work in Queens and his appeal to young voters.
But Paul Hortenstine, a historian, says that the number in Mamdani’s title is wrong.
“I would hope that the city takes the history of mayors very seriously,” Hortenstine said.
While looking into early mayors’ ties to the slave trade, he says he found proof that a mayoral term in the 1670s was wrongly not included in the official record.
Hortenstine told The Gothamist that he found records showing that Matthias Nicolls served a second term in 1675, but it was not consecutive. A piece of information the city forgot to write down.
Since then, officials have said that they knew about the research. Ken Cobb from the city’s Department of Records said the difference was surprising but worth looking into.
Hortenstine and historian Peter R. Christoph say that the mistake seems to go back to a city guide from 1841 that left out Nicolls’ second term.
“This was in 1675. So then, when I later looked through the official list of the city, I noticed that they had missed this term,” Hortenstine said.
Every record after that one made the same mistake.
Removing one term, like with US presidents, shifts the whole sequence that comes after because nonconsecutive terms count separately.
If the finding is formally accepted, Mamdani would be recorded as the 112th mayor instead of the 111th.
Mamdani’s power and move to the new job are not affected by the issue, but rather the historical numbers that go with his office. If the city changes the record, the materials for the inauguration and future records will just need to be updated.
In 1989, Peter R. Christoph wrote about the oversight in the “Record of the New York Genealogical and Biographical Society.”
“Edward I. Koch is the 105th Mayor of New York,” his essay began. “The City Of New York Official Directory says so. So does The New York Times. But they are wrong: He is the 106th. Not only is he misnumbered, but so is everyone else after Mayor No. 7. It is a mind-boggling thought: 99 mayors misnumbered — most of them gone to the grave, secure in the knowledge of their place in history, but all of them numerically out of whack. How could such a thing happen?”
Cobb was unable to locate any reference to Nicolls’ second term during a recent visit to the municipal archives. He did not, however, contest Hortenstine’s conclusions.
“We’re the keepers of the records. We’re not the creators of the records,” Cobb said. “It’s a good question. Who noticed this discrepancy? Apparently, this historian did.”
A correction to the official list of mayors has a precedent. Charles Lodwick, who held office from 1694 to 1695, was appointed as the 21st mayor in 1937.
“Everyone jumped up a number, and that’s been the way ever since,” Cobb said.
It’s unclear if Nicolls’ full place in mayoral history will be acknowledged by the Adams administration.
The first deputy mayor, Randy Mastro, claimed not to have heard of the missing mayor.
“I think we will leave this issue for historians and — for a change — the next administration,” Mastro said
"""My husband brought his mistress to our daughter’s wedding—and then asked me to give her my seat beside him.

"""My husband brought his mistress to our daughter’s wedding—and then asked me to give her my seat beside him. For a few seconds, I honestly thought I was looking at the wrong table, because my name card had vanished and Melissa’s was sitting exactly where mine had been on every seating chart. She wore a pale blue silk dress, lifted her champagne as if she belonged there, and avoided my eyes when I stopped beside the chair. David stood up, pointed to an empty seat at the next table, and quietly said, “For tonight, why don’t you sit over there?”
I had spent fourteen months helping our daughter, Emily, plan that wedding, from dress fittings and florist meetings to late-night calls over napkins and seating charts. That morning, while I fastened the pearl buttons on her gown, she made me promise I would enjoy the day and not let anything between her father and me touch it. I meant that promise, because whatever was left of my marriage, I would not make my daughter’s wedding the battlefield where it died. But David had apparently made a different plan, and he expected me to cooperate with it in silence.
When I asked what Melissa was doing there, David’s face showed guilt for only a second before he hid it behind irritation. He acted as though I were creating the problem simply by noticing that his mistress was seated at the family table in the place reserved for the bride’s mother. Then Melissa looked at me and said, “Honey, today really isn’t the day to make Emily uncomfortable.” I almost laughed, because the woman who had been sleeping with my husband for nearly a year was now warning me not to embarrass my own daughter.
I could feel people settling into nearby seats, laughing and talking, unaware that my marriage was being quietly rearranged in front of them. David kept his voice low and told me we should not “do this here,” as if the humiliation belonged to me because I refused to disappear politely. I looked at the empty chair he had chosen for me between a cousin and someone from the groom’s side, and I realized something colder than anger. This was not spontaneous; he had thought about where Melissa would sit, and he had assumed I would move.
For twenty-eight years, I had been the woman who adjusted, explained, forgave, and made excuses when David forgot anniversaries, missed dinners, or put work ahead of family. When he became distant, I learned to expect less instead of asking for more, and somewhere along the way he mistook that patience for permission. Even now, part of me considered taking the other chair, smiling for photographs, swallowing the humiliation, and telling myself it was all for Emily. I actually reached for the chair because protecting my daughter still mattered more to me than winning a public fight.
Then I heard one word behind me: “Mom?” Emily was walking toward us in her wedding dress, still glowing from the ceremony, and at first she looked confused rather than angry. Her eyes moved from me, to the empty chair, to Melissa, then back to the family table where she had personally placed me months ago. David quickly stepped in and announced that he had “rearranged a few things,” as if changing the bride’s seating chart without permission were no more serious than moving a centerpiece.
Emily asked why I was not sitting in my seat, and David casually pointed to the neighboring table and said I would be sitting “right there.” Her smile disappeared, and her eyes dropped to the place card in front of Melissa. I watched my daughter’s expression go completely still as she picked up that card and turned it over in her hand. In that instant, I understood the worst part: Emily had not approved this, and David had brought his mistress into our daughter’s wedding believing he could force everyone to accept what he wanted once it was already done.
What Emily did not know was that six months earlier, I had discovered David’s affair through a message that appeared on his phone while he was in the shower. Melissa had written, “I hate pretending I don’t miss you when she’s around,” followed by another message asking whether Friday was still theirs. When I confronted him, David spent eleven minutes calling me paranoid, insecure, dramatic, suspicious, and unfair before I repeated Melissa’s words exactly. The silence that followed ended our marriage long before either of us ever said the word divorce.
We had kept the details quiet because Emily was planning her wedding, and I refused to turn her happiest season into a crisis about us. David told me he was “confused,” that what he had with Melissa was “more complicated than an affair,” and that he needed time before making decisions. I agreed only that Emily’s wedding came first, so we slept in separate rooms, spoke carefully, and tried to appear functional while our marriage quietly collapsed. I believed David understood that one day required restraint, but he had apparently used that silence to prepare something else.
Three weeks before the wedding, he had casually asked whether Emily had finalized the family table and whether every seat had been assigned. At the time, I thought it was harmless conversation, but standing there with Melissa’s card in my daughter’s hand, I finally understood why he had asked. He had been checking whether there would be room, and when there was not, he simply removed me. Emily looked up at her father and asked, very quietly, “Where is Mom’s place card?”—and for the first time that night, David had no easy answer.
…FULL STORY IN THE COMMENT 👇👇👇"" "