Kid Rock speaks out, criticizing Live Nation’s CEO for deceiving fans: “Lining Their Pockets Off Talent They Never Had”
Kid Rock Calls Out Live Nation Exec To His Face During Senate Testimony: “Lining Their Pockets Off Talent They Never Had”

Can always count on Kid Rock to say what he’s thinking.
You might not expect to turn on CSPAN and see Kid Rock in Congress, but today the rocker whose real name is Robert Ritchie is on Capitol Hill testifying before the Senate Commerce Committee in a hearing on concert ticket prices and fees – and it got explosive right off the bat.
It’s an issue that Kid Rock has been especially outspoken about, meeting with Attorney General Pam Bondi on the problem earlier last year and even joining President Donald Trump in the Oval Office for a signing of an executive order aimed at taking action against ticket scalping.
And during his opening statement during the hearing today, Kid Rock held nothing back.
Along with Kid Rock, the hearing also featured testimony from Dan Wall, the Executive Vice President of Corporate and Regulatory Affairs for Live Nation. And Kid Rock had harsh words for Mr. Wall’s company as the executive was sitting right beside him:
“In 2009, Congress was told – under oath – that merging Live Nation and Ticketmaster would benefit artists and fans. The CEO of Live Nation called the merger an “experiment” and promised it would increase competition, empower artists, and lower costs. He also said, and I quote, “a system that empowers artists benefits everyone.”
Almost need a rim shot after that.”
Kid Rock would go on to say call the merger between Ticketmaster and Live Nation a failed experiment, although he admits it’s not the only problem with the ticketing industry:
“Should Ticketmaster and Live Nation be broken up? Probably. Would that alone fix things? I’m not sure it would.
But I am sure of this: No artist should be forced to sell their tickets without a say in who sells them and how they are sold.”
He then went on to blame corporate greed and the lack of a competitive market for the problems the industry is facing:
“If artists had real choice, real competition would follow. And tickets would end up in the hands of real fans, at the prices the artists set.
It’s no secret this industry is full of greedy snakes and scoundrels – too many suits lining their pockets off talent they never had and fans they mislead.
The truth is, much of this could have been – or still could be – solved through technology, especially proof-of-humanity tools. It hasn’t happened yet because there’s just too much money in the secondary ticket market.
Ticketing companies didn’t fail to stop this – it seems they chose not to.”
Of course the hearing comes at a time when Ticketmaster and Live Nation are being sued by the FTC and many states for deceptive ticketing practices and unfair pricing. And back in 2024, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the company seeking to break up their merger, accusing Live Nation of being a monopoly engaging in anti-competitive and illegal conduct.
Now, am I expecting anything to really come out of this hearing? Not really. Will these lawsuits actually fix the problem? Honestly, probably not.
But it’s nice to see these executives have to answer for the mess they’ve created.
"""My husband brought his mistress to our daughter’s wedding—and then asked me to give her my seat beside him.

"""My husband brought his mistress to our daughter’s wedding—and then asked me to give her my seat beside him. For a few seconds, I honestly thought I was looking at the wrong table, because my name card had vanished and Melissa’s was sitting exactly where mine had been on every seating chart. She wore a pale blue silk dress, lifted her champagne as if she belonged there, and avoided my eyes when I stopped beside the chair. David stood up, pointed to an empty seat at the next table, and quietly said, “For tonight, why don’t you sit over there?”
I had spent fourteen months helping our daughter, Emily, plan that wedding, from dress fittings and florist meetings to late-night calls over napkins and seating charts. That morning, while I fastened the pearl buttons on her gown, she made me promise I would enjoy the day and not let anything between her father and me touch it. I meant that promise, because whatever was left of my marriage, I would not make my daughter’s wedding the battlefield where it died. But David had apparently made a different plan, and he expected me to cooperate with it in silence.
When I asked what Melissa was doing there, David’s face showed guilt for only a second before he hid it behind irritation. He acted as though I were creating the problem simply by noticing that his mistress was seated at the family table in the place reserved for the bride’s mother. Then Melissa looked at me and said, “Honey, today really isn’t the day to make Emily uncomfortable.” I almost laughed, because the woman who had been sleeping with my husband for nearly a year was now warning me not to embarrass my own daughter.
I could feel people settling into nearby seats, laughing and talking, unaware that my marriage was being quietly rearranged in front of them. David kept his voice low and told me we should not “do this here,” as if the humiliation belonged to me because I refused to disappear politely. I looked at the empty chair he had chosen for me between a cousin and someone from the groom’s side, and I realized something colder than anger. This was not spontaneous; he had thought about where Melissa would sit, and he had assumed I would move.
For twenty-eight years, I had been the woman who adjusted, explained, forgave, and made excuses when David forgot anniversaries, missed dinners, or put work ahead of family. When he became distant, I learned to expect less instead of asking for more, and somewhere along the way he mistook that patience for permission. Even now, part of me considered taking the other chair, smiling for photographs, swallowing the humiliation, and telling myself it was all for Emily. I actually reached for the chair because protecting my daughter still mattered more to me than winning a public fight.
Then I heard one word behind me: “Mom?” Emily was walking toward us in her wedding dress, still glowing from the ceremony, and at first she looked confused rather than angry. Her eyes moved from me, to the empty chair, to Melissa, then back to the family table where she had personally placed me months ago. David quickly stepped in and announced that he had “rearranged a few things,” as if changing the bride’s seating chart without permission were no more serious than moving a centerpiece.
Emily asked why I was not sitting in my seat, and David casually pointed to the neighboring table and said I would be sitting “right there.” Her smile disappeared, and her eyes dropped to the place card in front of Melissa. I watched my daughter’s expression go completely still as she picked up that card and turned it over in her hand. In that instant, I understood the worst part: Emily had not approved this, and David had brought his mistress into our daughter’s wedding believing he could force everyone to accept what he wanted once it was already done.
What Emily did not know was that six months earlier, I had discovered David’s affair through a message that appeared on his phone while he was in the shower. Melissa had written, “I hate pretending I don’t miss you when she’s around,” followed by another message asking whether Friday was still theirs. When I confronted him, David spent eleven minutes calling me paranoid, insecure, dramatic, suspicious, and unfair before I repeated Melissa’s words exactly. The silence that followed ended our marriage long before either of us ever said the word divorce.
We had kept the details quiet because Emily was planning her wedding, and I refused to turn her happiest season into a crisis about us. David told me he was “confused,” that what he had with Melissa was “more complicated than an affair,” and that he needed time before making decisions. I agreed only that Emily’s wedding came first, so we slept in separate rooms, spoke carefully, and tried to appear functional while our marriage quietly collapsed. I believed David understood that one day required restraint, but he had apparently used that silence to prepare something else.
Three weeks before the wedding, he had casually asked whether Emily had finalized the family table and whether every seat had been assigned. At the time, I thought it was harmless conversation, but standing there with Melissa’s card in my daughter’s hand, I finally understood why he had asked. He had been checking whether there would be room, and when there was not, he simply removed me. Emily looked up at her father and asked, very quietly, “Where is Mom’s place card?”—and for the first time that night, David had no easy answer.
…FULL STORY IN THE COMMENT 👇👇👇"" "