'Criminal Charges' Rep. Tim Burchett drops a MOAB mother of all bombs confirming that Biden staffers were taking payoffs.
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) stated last week that he believes a client list tied to Jeffrey Epstein once existed but was “destroyed” by the Biden administration.
“I think the files existed at one time,” Burchett said in an interview on NewsNation’s “On Balance” with host Leland Vittert. “I think they were destroyed in the previous administration.”
A Justice Department memo released earlier that week determined that Epstein never maintained the purported client list used to blackmail prominent individuals, directly contradicting long-standing conspiracy theories. The memo also affirmed that Epstein died by suicide in his New York City jail cell in 2019, rejecting claims that his death was suspicious.
Burchett rejected suggestions from former Trump adviser Elon Musk and other media figures that President Trump’s name appeared on any such list.
“I think if they’d ever had anything on Trump, it would have been out Day 1 under the Biden administration,” the Tennessee Republican said.
“I think there’s some very prominent people. There’s Hollywood people,” he added. “I mean, I think there’s world leaders too. And would it have caused economic disruption around the globe? Maybe. But I don’t really care. I want to bury those dirtbags.”
Asked why Attorney General Pam Bondi wouldn’t come out and just say that the evidence has been destroyed, Burchett responded, “She doesn’t have any proof of it.”
“I’m just telling you what I think. I’ve been around this town enough,” the lawmaker continued. “I think she got over her skis pretty much saying all this stuff, the files are on my desk, I’m going to release it, and then she releases stuff that I knew.”
“I think they all got out there, got a little excited, and I don’t think they exist,” he added, referring to the files.
Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Deputy Director Dan Bongino have faced intense scrutiny from leading MAGA figures who suspect the government is suppressing explosive details about Epstein. Notably, both Patel and Bongino promoted similar theories before joining the administration.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said last week as well that the DOJ’s conclusion is the result of an “exhaustive review of all of the files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes and his death.”
She noted that the Trump administration withheld certain material because of its graphic content.
In 2019, during Trump’s first term, Epstein was federally charged with running a sex-trafficking ring that exploited underage girls from 2002 to 2005. He died in prison a month later before his case went to trial, after having previously pleaded guilty to separate sexual misconduct offenses.
The official cause of death was suicide.
The former attorney for deceased human trafficker “unequivocally” said that Trump is nowhere to be seen on the infamous list of clients that his former client had.
David Schoen, who represented Epstein in the final weeks before he died in 2019, revealed in June that he had questioned his imprisoned client about any potential dirt on Trump.
The comments resurfaced last week as a new twist in the already chaotic saga of the Trump administration’s handling of Epstein’s files.
“I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein’s defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!” Schoen said in a post on X.
The DOJ concluded that Epstein died by suicide and maintains that no list exists naming the powerful individuals allegedly involved in his network of sexual abuse, Fox News reported.
In a joint memo obtained by Fox News last week, the DOJ and FBI stated they had no additional information to release regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s case or death.
CHAOS On the Set! House Minority Leader Explodes At CNBC Host After He's Cornered Over Obamacare Subsidies
NEW YORK, NY — The polished veneer of the Democrat healthcare narrative shattered on national television this week as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries suffered a visible and vocal meltdown on CNBC’s "Squawk Box." In a segment that has quickly gone viral across the 2026 digital landscape, host Becky Quick executed a clinical cross-examination of the Democrat strategy to ransom the U.S. government over the sunsetting of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies.
The confrontation marked a pivotal moment in the post-government shutdown political theater, exposing what Speaker Mike Johnson has termed the "Politics of Fear." As Jeffries pivoted, deflected, and eventually erupted in anger, the cold hard reality of the 2026 healthcare crisis was laid bare: a system defined by 60% premium increases, a trillion-dollar price tag, and a Democrat leadership more interested in political leverage than bipartisan solutions.
I. THE CNBC CORNER: "LET’S NOT GO BACK TO THE PAST"
The tension began when Becky Quick pressed Jeffries on the necessity of a bipartisan approach to the looming expiration of taxpayer-provided ACA subsidies. These subsidies, which have artificially suppressed the soaring costs of Obamacare premiums, were strategically set to sunset on December 1, 2025, by the Biden-led Congress—a move critics say was designed to create a "cliff" that would force a Republican-led House into a spending trap.
1. The "Hang Themselves" Accusation
The debate reached a boiling point when Quick directly challenged Jeffries’ motivations for refusing to negotiate on a sustainable, bipartisan reform.
“I don’t think you want to get a deal done,” Quick said, looking directly at a stunned Jeffries. “I think this is something where you’d like to see the rates go higher and allow Republicans to hang themselves with it.”
The assertion struck a nerve. Jeffries, visibly frustrated, abandoned his usual measured tone. “That is a ridiculous assertion! Shame on you!” he shot back, his voice rising as the set descended into chaos. For the American public, the explosion was a tell—a sign that the host had accurately identified the Democrat "Lawfare" strategy being applied to the healthcare sector.
II. THE 60 PERCENT REALITY: OBAMACARE’S FAILED PROMISE
While Jeffries focused on rhetoric, Speaker Mike Johnson utilized his weekly press conference to provide the devastating statistics that have defined the ACA in 2026. The "Affordable" Care Act has become anything but, with the GOP majority revealing that by some estimates, premiums have risen an average of 60% since the program's inception.
1. Subsidies for Insurance Giants
Johnson argued that the "trillion dollars in new spending" demanded by Democrats to reopen the government was not going to patients, but was instead a direct transfer of wealth to insurance companies.
“The Democrats don’t reform Obamacare. They want to subsidize it,” Johnson explained. “That goes mostly to insurance companies, which makes the cost rise further. That’s the Democrats’ plan.”
By continuing to pump taxpayer billions into a broken system, the GOP argues that the radical left is merely inflating the bubble while masking the true, unsustainable cost of the healthcare mandates passed without a single Republican vote in 2010.
III. SAVING MEDICAID: THE AUDIT OF INELIGIBILITY
One of the most significant achievements of the 2026 Republican House has been the aggressive "cleanup" of the Medicaid system—a move Johnson cited as proof that the GOP is the party "fighting to save healthcare."
1. Removing Millions of Ineligible Enrollees
The Speaker revealed that the GOP has successfully moved millions of ineligible enrollees off the Medicaid rolls. This audit was not a cut to services, but a restoration of the program’s original intent.
“We got millions of ineligible enrollees off the program and it preserved it,” Johnson said. “It strengthened Medicaid for the people who rely upon it, which is the elderly, disabled, and young pregnant women.”
By eliminating the fraud, waste, and abuse that had bloated the system under the previous administration, the GOP has ensured that the safety net remains solvent for the most vulnerable Americans. The Democrat opposition to these common-sense audits, Johnson argued, is further evidence that they prioritize "raw numbers" over "quality care."
IV. THE POLITICS OF FEAR VS. THE MANDATE FOR REFORM
The recent government shutdown, which many in the media attempted to frame as a Republican failure, was re-categorized by Johnson as a "false claim" induced by Democrat intransigence. He asserted that the conflict was never truly about healthcare, but about the Radical Left’s fear of losing control over the taxpayer purse.
1. Ransom and Leverage
The December 1 sunset was a "timed bomb" left by the Biden administration. By refusing to work on a bipartisan fix throughout 2025, Jeffries and the House Democrats hoped to use the resulting premium spikes as a political weapon in the 2026 Midterms.
“No, [the shutdown] is not about healthcare,” Johnson declared. “This is about FEAR. Everyone in America understands that this is about something else.” That "something else" is the continued attempt to expand the "Deep State" bureaucracy into every facet of the American economy, using the health of the citizens as collateral.
V. THE 2026 RENAISSANCE: A NEW HEALTHCARE DOCTRINE
As the 2026 Renaissance continues to sweep through Washington, the Trump-aligned GOP is proposing a total shift away from the "subsidy-and-spend" model of the last 15 years. The new doctrine focuses on:
Reducing Costs through Competition: Moving away from state-mandated monopolies.
Increasing Access and Quality: Allowing for more diverse and affordable plan options.
Eliminating Fraud: Continuing the aggressive audits started by Speaker Johnson.
The confrontation on CNBC served as a microcosm of the national debate. On one side, Hakeem Jeffries represents the "Old Guard" of the DNC—relying on explosions of anger and accusations of "shame" to deflect from the fiscal failure of their policies. On the other side, the GOP majority is presenting a "Victorious American" vision: a healthcare system that is sustainable, accountable, and actually affordable.
CONCLUSION: THE END OF THE HEALTHCARE GRIFT
Hakeem Jeffries’ explosion at Becky Quick was not just a moment of bad television; it was the sound of a narrative collapsing. For over a decade, Democrats have used the "Affordable Care Act" as a moral shield to justify trillions in spending. In 2026, with premiums up 60% and the GOP exposing the "insurance company payday," that shield has shattered.
May you like
Speaker Mike Johnson and the House GOP have called the Democrats' bluff. By reopening the government without surrendering to the trillion-dollar subsidy demand, they have forced the discussion back to actual reform and fiscal reality.
The era of "subsidizing the failure" is over. As we head toward the 2026 Midterms, the American people are seeing the difference between those who want to "hang" their opponents with higher rates and those who are doing the hard work of saving the safety net for the elderly and disabled. The chaos on the CNBC set was the beginning of the end for the Obamacare grift.
