BREAKING: Memo to Congress Claims NO PROBABLE CAUSE in Biden Raid on Mar-a-Lago…
The bombshell disclosures show the FBI spent weeks attempting to justify a warrant but failed to uncover sufficient evidence, only to be overruled by the Biden Department of Justice.
Internal emails obtained and released by Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa confirm that senior FBI officials repeatedly warned DOJ leaders that the legal threshold for a raid had not been met.
One FBI official bluntly admitted, “We haven’t generated any new facts, but keep being given draft after draft after draft.”
Newly released FBI records are reigniting outrage over the August 2022 raid on President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, revealing that federal agents themselves doubted they had probable cause to carry out the unprecedented search.
The same official questioned how long agents were expected to push forward without evidence, asking, “Absent a witness coming forward with recent information about classified on site, at what point is it fair to table this?”
Despite those concerns, DOJ officials pressed ahead, making clear they were uninterested in caution, restraint, or public trust.
In one explosive exchange, a senior DOJ official reportedly declared that he “frankly didn’t give a damn about the optics” of raiding a former president’s home.
That attitude now sits at the center of conservative accusations that federal law enforcement was weaponized against Trump for political reasons.
Grassley described the records as “shocking,” emphasizing that “the FBI DID NOT BELIEVE IT HAD PROBABLE CAUSE to raid Pres Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home but Biden DOJ pushed for it anyway.”
The documents show FBI leaders urged less intrusive alternatives, including further cooperation with Trump’s legal team.
An FBI agent wrote that “a reasonable conversation with the former president’s attorney ought not to be discounted,” warning that a raid could prove “counterproductive.”
Newly released FBI records are reigniting outrage over the August 2022 raid on President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, revealing that federal agents themselves doubted they had probable cause to carry out the unprecedented search.
The bombshell disclosures show the FBI spent weeks attempting to justify a warrant but failed to uncover sufficient evidence, only to be overruled by the Biden Department of Justice.
Internal emails obtained and released by Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa confirm that senior FBI officials repeatedly warned DOJ leaders that the legal threshold for a raid had not been met.
One FBI official bluntly admitted, “We haven’t generated any new facts, but keep being given draft after draft after draft.”

The same official questioned how long agents were expected to push forward without evidence, asking, “Absent a witness coming forward with recent information about classified on site, at what point is it fair to table this?”
Despite those concerns, DOJ officials pressed ahead, making clear they were uninterested in caution, restraint, or public trust.
In one explosive exchange, a senior DOJ official reportedly declared that he “frankly didn’t give a damn about the optics” of raiding a former president’s home.
That attitude now sits at the center of conservative accusations that federal law enforcement was weaponized against Trump for political reasons.
Grassley described the records as “shocking,” emphasizing that “the FBI DID NOT BELIEVE IT HAD PROBABLE CAUSE to raid Pres Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home but Biden DOJ pushed for it anyway.”
The documents show FBI leaders urged less intrusive alternatives, including further cooperation with Trump’s legal team.
An FBI agent wrote that “a reasonable conversation with the former president’s attorney ought not to be discounted,” warning that a raid could prove “counterproductive.”

Those warnings were ignored.
On August 8, 2022, dozens of FBI agents descended on Mar-a-Lago while Trump was away, entering private living quarters and even Melania Trump’s bedroom.
Trump later said agents “raided and occupied” his home and broke into a personal safe, a claim supported by later disclosures.
Emails also reveal that DOJ officials had been preparing for a search warrant weeks earlier, even while acknowledging gaps in evidence.
One FBI official admitted the information supporting the warrant was “single source, has not been corroborated, and may be dated.”
"""My husband brought his mistress to our daughter’s wedding—and then asked me to give her my seat beside him.

"""My husband brought his mistress to our daughter’s wedding—and then asked me to give her my seat beside him. For a few seconds, I honestly thought I was looking at the wrong table, because my name card had vanished and Melissa’s was sitting exactly where mine had been on every seating chart. She wore a pale blue silk dress, lifted her champagne as if she belonged there, and avoided my eyes when I stopped beside the chair. David stood up, pointed to an empty seat at the next table, and quietly said, “For tonight, why don’t you sit over there?”
I had spent fourteen months helping our daughter, Emily, plan that wedding, from dress fittings and florist meetings to late-night calls over napkins and seating charts. That morning, while I fastened the pearl buttons on her gown, she made me promise I would enjoy the day and not let anything between her father and me touch it. I meant that promise, because whatever was left of my marriage, I would not make my daughter’s wedding the battlefield where it died. But David had apparently made a different plan, and he expected me to cooperate with it in silence.
When I asked what Melissa was doing there, David’s face showed guilt for only a second before he hid it behind irritation. He acted as though I were creating the problem simply by noticing that his mistress was seated at the family table in the place reserved for the bride’s mother. Then Melissa looked at me and said, “Honey, today really isn’t the day to make Emily uncomfortable.” I almost laughed, because the woman who had been sleeping with my husband for nearly a year was now warning me not to embarrass my own daughter.
I could feel people settling into nearby seats, laughing and talking, unaware that my marriage was being quietly rearranged in front of them. David kept his voice low and told me we should not “do this here,” as if the humiliation belonged to me because I refused to disappear politely. I looked at the empty chair he had chosen for me between a cousin and someone from the groom’s side, and I realized something colder than anger. This was not spontaneous; he had thought about where Melissa would sit, and he had assumed I would move.
For twenty-eight years, I had been the woman who adjusted, explained, forgave, and made excuses when David forgot anniversaries, missed dinners, or put work ahead of family. When he became distant, I learned to expect less instead of asking for more, and somewhere along the way he mistook that patience for permission. Even now, part of me considered taking the other chair, smiling for photographs, swallowing the humiliation, and telling myself it was all for Emily. I actually reached for the chair because protecting my daughter still mattered more to me than winning a public fight.
Then I heard one word behind me: “Mom?” Emily was walking toward us in her wedding dress, still glowing from the ceremony, and at first she looked confused rather than angry. Her eyes moved from me, to the empty chair, to Melissa, then back to the family table where she had personally placed me months ago. David quickly stepped in and announced that he had “rearranged a few things,” as if changing the bride’s seating chart without permission were no more serious than moving a centerpiece.
Emily asked why I was not sitting in my seat, and David casually pointed to the neighboring table and said I would be sitting “right there.” Her smile disappeared, and her eyes dropped to the place card in front of Melissa. I watched my daughter’s expression go completely still as she picked up that card and turned it over in her hand. In that instant, I understood the worst part: Emily had not approved this, and David had brought his mistress into our daughter’s wedding believing he could force everyone to accept what he wanted once it was already done.
What Emily did not know was that six months earlier, I had discovered David’s affair through a message that appeared on his phone while he was in the shower. Melissa had written, “I hate pretending I don’t miss you when she’s around,” followed by another message asking whether Friday was still theirs. When I confronted him, David spent eleven minutes calling me paranoid, insecure, dramatic, suspicious, and unfair before I repeated Melissa’s words exactly. The silence that followed ended our marriage long before either of us ever said the word divorce.
We had kept the details quiet because Emily was planning her wedding, and I refused to turn her happiest season into a crisis about us. David told me he was “confused,” that what he had with Melissa was “more complicated than an affair,” and that he needed time before making decisions. I agreed only that Emily’s wedding came first, so we slept in separate rooms, spoke carefully, and tried to appear functional while our marriage quietly collapsed. I believed David understood that one day required restraint, but he had apparently used that silence to prepare something else.
Three weeks before the wedding, he had casually asked whether Emily had finalized the family table and whether every seat had been assigned. At the time, I thought it was harmless conversation, but standing there with Melissa’s card in my daughter’s hand, I finally understood why he had asked. He had been checking whether there would be room, and when there was not, he simply removed me. Emily looked up at her father and asked, very quietly, “Where is Mom’s place card?”—and for the first time that night, David had no easy answer.
…FULL STORY IN THE COMMENT 👇👇👇"" "